Skip to content 
Litigation Support: Digital Forensic Document Drafting
Trial lawyers face a persistent challenge in technology-driven litigation: drafting discovery documents and preservation correspondence that account for the technical realities of electronically stored information. A poorly scoped preservation letter can allow spoliation. An imprecise request for production can yield terabytes of irrelevant data — or miss critical evidence entirely.
Carney Forensics bridges the gap between legal strategy and technical precision, drafting litigation documents grounded in a working knowledge of how data is created, stored, and destroyed across modern IT environments.
Legal Credentials & Technical Expertise
Carney Forensics is not a technology firm advising on legal matters. It is a firm built on licensed legal practice and deep forensic technical knowledge. The managing partner holds a Juris Doctor degree and has been licensed for over twenty years in state and federal courts.
This dual foundation in law and technology means that every document Carney Forensics produces is drafted with the procedural requirements, evidentiary standards, and strategic objectives of litigation firmly in view.
Beyond licensure, the managing partner routinely teaches continuing legal education courses to trial lawyers on digital forensics topics — including ESI preservation, forensic data collection methodologies, and the intersection of electronic evidence and the rules of civil procedure.
This ongoing engagement with the civil litigation community ensures that Carney Forensics’ document drafting reflects current case law developments, evolving judicial expectations around ESI, and the practical challenges trial lawyers encounter in technology-intensive cases.
Carney Forensics also maintains a licensed notary public on staff, providing authentication and notarization of written documents as part of its litigation support services. This allows for streamlined execution of declarations, affidavits, verifications, and other sworn documents without requiring outside, or after hours, coordination.
Preservation Letters & Litigation Hold Notices
Effective preservation begins with specificity. Carney Forensics drafts preservation letters and litigation hold notices that identify relevant data sources by system, custodian, and data type. Evidence sources frequently overlooked in standard holds can be ephemeral messaging platforms, cloud-based collaboration tools, mobile device backups, and automated deletion policies.
Each letter and hold is tailored to the opposing party’s known or anticipated technology environment, ensuring that preservation obligations are communicated in terms that both legal counsel and IT personnel can act on without ambiguity.
Interrogatories Targeting Electronically Stored Information
Generic interrogatories rarely surface the technical details needed to build or defend a digital forensics case. Carney Forensics drafts interrogatories designed to elicit meaningful disclosure about an opposing party’s data infrastructure including file systems, retention schedules, backup architectures, access controls, and chain-of-custody practices. These interrogatories are structured to establish a factual foundation for subsequent discovery requests, depositions of IT custodians, and potential spoliation arguments.
Requests for Production
Requests for production involving ESI require a level of technical specificity that goes beyond traditional document requests. Carney Forensics prepares requests that define the scope of production by file type, metadata fields, date ranges, custodians, and storage locations.
Where appropriate, requests address the format of production specifying native file formats, load file structures, computer imaging, or mobile extraction protocols. These ensure that produced data retains its evidentiary integrity and is usable for forensic analysis.
Objections & Responses to Discovery Requests
When your client is on the receiving end of ESI-related discovery, Carney Forensics assists in evaluating the technical feasibility, burden, and proportionality of incoming requests. This includes drafting objections grounded in the realities of data architecture such as the cost and complexity of restoring legacy backup tapes, extracting data from challenging proprietary systems, or de-duplicating across custodians. Carney Forensics crafts responses that satisfy discovery obligations that conform with the rules, without unnecessary overproduction.
Why Technical Precision Matters in Litigation Documents
Electronically stored information (ESI) does not behave like paper. Data exists across distributed systems, is subject to automatic modification and deletion, and often requires specialized discovery or forensic tools to collect and review. Litigation documents drafted without this understanding risk being both over-inclusive and under-inclusive, wastefully generating unnecessary cost while leaving critical evidence gaps.
Carney Forensics brings scientific, technical knowledge directly into the drafting process, so that every preservation letter, litigation hold, interrogatory, and production request reflects how data actually works in practice.
